<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How easily could YOU be framed for criminal activity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/</link>
	<description>Stay safe online with jargon-free security hints, tips and resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hely</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>Thanks for advising me about the broken link, April.

If Google are going to change their references to news articles I&#039;ll have to avoid using them.

I have amended the link in the article above to point directly to the AAP article as it was published in an Australian newspaper, but you can find it in other publications all around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for advising me about the broken link, April.</p>
<p>If Google are going to change their references to news articles I&#8217;ll have to avoid using them.</p>
<p>I have amended the link in the article above to point directly to the AAP article as it was published in an Australian newspaper, but you can find it in other publications all around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>Scary stuff, there.  I hope I don&#039;t have any tech savvy enemies I don&#039;t know about!

The article is a good read... your link to it needs updating though.  I get &quot;The article requested is no longer available&quot; when I click it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary stuff, there.  I hope I don&#8217;t have any tech savvy enemies I don&#8217;t know about!</p>
<p>The article is a good read&#8230; your link to it needs updating though.  I get &#8220;The article requested is no longer available&#8221; when I click it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hely</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>While you might reasonably think that it would be a simple matter of naming some products, it&#039;s not that simple at all. However I can&#039;t turn this response into an article in itself, so I will do just that and omit the conditions and explanations.

For the average person on the average PC you can&#039;t go far wrong with AVG Anti-Virus. With the release of AVG v.8 I no longer view the free version as offering suitable protection. There is a comparison table on the Grisoft website that clearly illustrates there is now too much missing from the free version to make it a viable option. Rootkit detection alone makes the retail version worth every bit of the small cost. There is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackersnightmare.com/AVGTrial&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trial version&lt;/a&gt; you can run for 30 days before paying for it. I also recommend you invest only in the plain AVG Anti-Virus product, not the extended AVG Internet Security or AVG Anti-Virus with Firewall. Grisoft made their name with a quality anti-virus product. Other developers do a better job of firewall, anti-spyware, etc.

I have an equally high regard for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackersnightmare.com/NOD32&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eset&#039;s NOD32 Anti-Virus&lt;/a&gt;. To be honest, if I was starting from scratch and I had to choose between NOD32 and AVG, it would come down to the toss of a coin. I stick with AVG because I&#039;ve had a long relationship with it and see no reason to change. If for some reason or other you don&#039;t wish to use AVG, try NOD32.

On software firewalls, both COMODO and Online Armor are quality products. I used COMODO in the past but have switched to&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackersnightmare.com/Online_Armor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Online Armor&lt;/a&gt;. Technically and effectively it&#039;s every bit as good as Comodo, but is a simpler install and seems to be less intrusive once it&#039;s up and running.

The much neglected &quot;hardware firewall&quot; in the form of a suitable NAT router is probably one of the most effective safeguards you can employ for a home or very small business computing environment. In my opinion it should be the very first protective mechanism installed BEFORE you ever venture onto the Internet. It&#039;s too big a subject to get into here, but has been addressed in depth in a Module in the new member&#039;s website.

Finally, please, no &quot;what about...&quot; or &quot;you forgot to mention...&quot; responses. That could go on forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you might reasonably think that it would be a simple matter of naming some products, it&#8217;s not that simple at all. However I can&#8217;t turn this response into an article in itself, so I will do just that and omit the conditions and explanations.</p>
<p>For the average person on the average PC you can&#8217;t go far wrong with AVG Anti-Virus. With the release of AVG v.8 I no longer view the free version as offering suitable protection. There is a comparison table on the Grisoft website that clearly illustrates there is now too much missing from the free version to make it a viable option. Rootkit detection alone makes the retail version worth every bit of the small cost. There is a <a href="http://www.hackersnightmare.com/AVGTrial" rel="nofollow">Trial version</a> you can run for 30 days before paying for it. I also recommend you invest only in the plain AVG Anti-Virus product, not the extended AVG Internet Security or AVG Anti-Virus with Firewall. Grisoft made their name with a quality anti-virus product. Other developers do a better job of firewall, anti-spyware, etc.</p>
<p>I have an equally high regard for <a href="http://www.hackersnightmare.com/NOD32" rel="nofollow">Eset&#8217;s NOD32 Anti-Virus</a>. To be honest, if I was starting from scratch and I had to choose between NOD32 and AVG, it would come down to the toss of a coin. I stick with AVG because I&#8217;ve had a long relationship with it and see no reason to change. If for some reason or other you don&#8217;t wish to use AVG, try NOD32.</p>
<p>On software firewalls, both COMODO and Online Armor are quality products. I used COMODO in the past but have switched to<a href="http://www.hackersnightmare.com/Online_Armor" rel="nofollow"> Online Armor</a>. Technically and effectively it&#8217;s every bit as good as Comodo, but is a simpler install and seems to be less intrusive once it&#8217;s up and running.</p>
<p>The much neglected &#8220;hardware firewall&#8221; in the form of a suitable NAT router is probably one of the most effective safeguards you can employ for a home or very small business computing environment. In my opinion it should be the very first protective mechanism installed BEFORE you ever venture onto the Internet. It&#8217;s too big a subject to get into here, but has been addressed in depth in a Module in the new member&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>Finally, please, no &#8220;what about&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;you forgot to mention&#8230;&#8221; responses. That could go on forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Foale</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Foale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>which antivirus and firewall programs do you currently recommend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which antivirus and firewall programs do you currently recommend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hely</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>Not really Fabian. Other than the nature of the content, unwanted material doesn&#039;t look any different to your legitimate stuff. Files/folders will almost certainly be given an innocuous name and may even be hidden, because the perpetrator will be well aware that a competent forensic investigation will reveal it anyway.

If the offending material is in the form of a video file (ostensibly the most damning of evidence) there won&#039;t even be any keywords to search on.

The key is to have effective, broad and deep security in place to prevent access in the first place. Considering just how wide open the average Windows PC is, I think this is a vindictive tactic we can expect to see more of in the future.

Up-to-date anti-virus software is important, but isn&#039;t sufficient defense by itself. Unwanted material can be lodged on your computer by means other than utilizing a virus. Firewalls, both hardware and software, are mandatory for really effective protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really Fabian. Other than the nature of the content, unwanted material doesn&#8217;t look any different to your legitimate stuff. Files/folders will almost certainly be given an innocuous name and may even be hidden, because the perpetrator will be well aware that a competent forensic investigation will reveal it anyway.</p>
<p>If the offending material is in the form of a video file (ostensibly the most damning of evidence) there won&#8217;t even be any keywords to search on.</p>
<p>The key is to have effective, broad and deep security in place to prevent access in the first place. Considering just how wide open the average Windows PC is, I think this is a vindictive tactic we can expect to see more of in the future.</p>
<p>Up-to-date anti-virus software is important, but isn&#8217;t sufficient defense by itself. Unwanted material can be lodged on your computer by means other than utilizing a virus. Firewalls, both hardware and software, are mandatory for really effective protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Foale</title>
		<link>http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/threat-warnings/how-easily-could-you-be-framed-for-criminal-activity/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Foale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computerandonlinesecurity.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>Are there any telltale signs that unwanted material has been downloaded onto one&#039;s computer?
If one&#039;s antivirus program has always been kept up to date, can one safely assume that the computer if clean?
Where would one look for such material?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any telltale signs that unwanted material has been downloaded onto one&#8217;s computer?<br />
If one&#8217;s antivirus program has always been kept up to date, can one safely assume that the computer if clean?<br />
Where would one look for such material?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

